Dolores Huerta says hello. The Last March and funeral of Cesar Chavez

In this photo which has never been published until now, Dolores Huerta steps out of her dress shoes and into tennis shoes to participate in "The Last March" at the funeral of her United Farm Workers co-founder Cesar Chavez.
In this photo which has never been published until now, Dolores Huerta steps out of her dress shoes and into tennis shoes to participate in “The Last March” at the funeral of her United Farm Workers co-founder Cesar Chavez in Delano, California.

The bulletin from the Associated Press flashed across the computer in The Bakersfield Californian’s photo department a few minutes after 9 am on Friday, April 23, 1993. I was alone and raced down the stairs to the third floor newsroom, where a group of editors and reporters were chatting. The day was just getting started, coffee was brewing, receptionists were handling what seemed to be a never-ending stream of phone calls that poured in all day long in those pre-email and social media days. Nobody else had yet seen the bulletin. “Cesar Chavez has died in Arizona,” I blurted out. “The AP just moved a bulletin.” And with that, a chain of events that would lead to the largest team coverage project in my career, and likely in the newspaper’s history, were in play.

Chavez, of course, was a labor and civil rights titan, co-founder of the United Farm Workers of America and a figure whose national prominence approached that of the greatest civil rights crusaders of the era. And he was local. He lived in Keene, California, a small community nestled in the mountains just a 25-minute drive from downtown Bakersfield. He rose to prominence and worldwide fame after his United Farm Workers Association joined with Larry Itilong’s Agricultural Workers Organizing Committee, which organized Filipino farm laborers in Delano, another nearby community, about 30 miles north of Bakersfield. The merger of the two would lead to the eventual formation of the United Farm Workers. This was our story. Of course, it would also be the biggest story in the nation, but it was in our back yard. As far as we were concerned, it was ours.

But it didn’t start out well. Instantly, I knew what needed to be done. I needed to hook up with a reporter, get in a car and head to Chavez’ compound, called La Paz, in Keene. We could be there in less than half an hour. What was going on in that compound as word spread that the UFW president and beloved leader had died? Who knew? That’s why we needed to get there, and get there fast. Get there before the UFW’s finely-polished publicists and public relations people did. Get there before the other media did. Get there to capture the potential raw emotion, talk to people, get the color that is so crucial to a story of this magnitude. And then the editors got involved. Want to see a story go south in a heartbeat? Get the editors involved. I announced that I was heading to Keene, who was coming with me? Wait up, said the editors. We need to have a meeting. Wait up? We need to have a meeting? Good God, editors and their meetings. Don’t get me started on editors and their damn meetings. Too late, I’m started.

If you ever want to journey into journalism hell, sit in on an editors’ meeting. I worked in the business for 28 years, and never understood or figured out why editors had to have so many meetings. They were so brutally boring, sometimes droning on for more than an hour, that on the occasions I would fill in as photo editor and was involuntarily forced to sit in on them, I would look for excuses to get out of attending. My specialty was giving a photo assignment around the time of the meeting to myself, then telling the editors I couldn’t sit in, the assignment had to be shot and all the photographers were busy. It worked every time, thank God! I once worked with an editor who would read every word of every story he was putting in his section during the afternoon editors’ meeting. How I never rammed a pen through my eye just so an ambulance would come and get me out of there, I don’t know. I knew editors who wouldn’t take a piss without holding a two-hour meeting with their kidneys. I never understood why editors simply didn’t come out of their offices a few times a day and just talk to people about what was going on and what would be in the next day’s paper. No meeting necessary. As best I could figure, we all came from the era of the great television show “Lou Grant.” The editors’ meetings on “Lou Grant” were cool, Lou and Charley and Mrs. Pinchon waxing oh so poetically about the First Amendment and the right of the citizens to be informed, Rossi and Billie and The Animal eagerly looking to devour every pearl of wisdom their great and knowing leaders could impart. So maybe everybody wanted to be Lou Grant, I don’t know. But on this day, in those early moments, editors meetings were just about the dumbest idea anybody could come up with.

The first meeting was to decide which reporters to call in. Fine, I argued, but in the meantime, let me head up to Keene. No, wait, they said. Shit. The next meeting was to determine how we would cover the story. Fine, I argued, but in the meantime, we have to get up to Keene. No, wait, they said. Shit. Ah, finally, the reporters arrive. OK, now we can go, right? No, wait, they said. We now need a meeting to determine what the reporters’ coverage responsibilities will be. Shit.

Finally, the meetings were done. A plan was in place! It was fucking 1:30 pm, four and a half hours after the initial Associated Press bulletin moved. We arrived in Keene at 2 pm and were greeted by – guess what? – just about every Los Angeles media outlet, which had beat us to our own story by a good two hours or more. And they had gotten into La Paz, too! The UFW public relations folks were there now, and had cut off access to the compound. We waited a while and were finally allowed in to report the story. If I wasn’t pissed enough already, I would make an error in one of my cutlines, misidentifying a Chavez relative. The coverage in the next day’s paper would not reflect what I considered a major failure on the part of a newspaper considered one of the better mid-sized newspapers in California. The stories were good, the UFW did not restrict our access or attempt to control who we photographed or spoke with once we were allowed in. But I still wonder to this day, what could we have gotten had we responded immediately? What historic images presented themselves, only to flash away into oblivion, never to be seen? We’ll never know. We failed on that day. I failed on that day. We needed to do better. And we did.

As the Chavez funeral plans took shape, we found ourselves dealing with another newsroom issue. Celebrities. They were going to be at the funeral in a big way. Jesse Jackson was coming. The actor Edward James Olmos was coming. The comedian Paul Rodriguez. Former California Governor Jerry Brown. And, of course, the Kennedy family. The Kennedy family was a biggie, because of the late Sen. Robert Kennedy’s friendship and support of Chavez during his famous grape boycotts and hunger strikes. In The Californian’s newsroom, the word of the celebrities attending began to generate an excitement disproportionate to the story itself. It seemed the editors – including one very high-ranking editor – were more excited about which celebrities were attending than the news and historic value of the funeral. It wasn’t just me who felt this. Photo editor Casey Christie did, too, and we began a three or four day process of hammering the editors about what we perceived to be their over-excitement about the celebrities. The estimates were that 10,000 to 100,000 people were going to show for Chavez’s funeral. Our concern was that the editors were going to have us on a wild hunt for celebrities in the crowd. We wanted to photograph the funeral. The march. The people. The workers. We were photojournalists, not paparazzi. We didn’t care about the celebrities. We were especially concerned about Jesse Jackson. No person has ever been able to completely turn an event into a story about himself like Jesse Jackson. I don’t know if he does it intentionally or if it happens because the media is so infatuated by him. Never really thought about it. What I do know is the result is indisputable: when Jackson shows, he becomes the story and the story becomes the background. Casey and I wanted the story to be “Tens of thousands mourn Cesar Chavez.” Our fear was that the story was going to become “Jesse Jackson attends Chavez funeral.”

I don’t know if it was because they bought in to our argument or if they just wanted to shut us up – we were really hammering them – but we got a concession from the editors. They would not emphasize the celebrities. If we saw one, take a picture, but don’t spend any time searching them out. We were thrilled.

Bob Bentley was executive editor of The Bakersfield Californian for 12 years, from 1982 to 1994. His management style was confrontational, and his tenure was frequently marked by conflict as the majority of his staff returned his own, “in-your-face” style with a flourish. One thing the newsroom was not under Bentley was boring. Hard-nosed, strong willed editor. Equally hard-nosed, strong-willed reporters and photographers. You didn’t get fired for saying “fuck you,” you earned grudging admiration, so long as you were good at your job. Enough sparks flying in that newsroom that we didn’t need to buy our electricity from PG&E. But Bentley also had a plan. One of his first concerns was the lack of minority representation in the newsroom. When I arrived at The Californian in 1980, the editorial staff was almost 100 percent white. The pre-Bentley editors thought they made inroads when they hired their first bilingual reporter, a woman named Donna Reyes. Unfortunately, they didn’t bother to ask what the other language she spoke was, and when they attempted to send her into the fields to do a Spanish-language interview, learned that she was bilingual in English and Chinese. Damn, you gotta check those things out, don’t you think? Bentley began hiring Spanish speaking, Latino reporters. One of them, Leonel Martinez, even lived in labor camp housing, and brought an incredible knowledge and personal understanding of the farm worker culture to his reporting. Black reporters were hired, too. By the time of the Chavez funeral in 1993, the ethnic makeup of The Bakersfield Californian newsroom either equaled or came close to the ethnic makeup of the community. We were well positioned to effectively cover the funeral of Cesar Chavez.

Fourteen staffers – nine reporters and five photographers – were assigned to the funeral and last march of Cesar Chavez on Thursday, April 29, which began in Delano and concluded at the UFW’s Forty Acres headquarters, four miles away. The newspaper also rented out the top floor of a newly-built motel in Delano to serve as a temporary headquarters. I don’t know how many assistant editors, copy editors and page designers also worked on the coverage, but it’s a safe bet that around 25 of the newsroom’s then approximately 70 staffers worked on the Chavez funeral. We arrived in Delano just after dawn. Felix Adamo, Julie Rogers and I were assigned to cover the march and the thousands of mourners who would walk the four miles through the farm fields from Delano to Forty Acres. Ed Homich was assigned to cover the mass and service at Forty Acres, and Alan Ferguson covered the march, which stretched three miles in length, from the air. The reporters were Scott Forter, Leonel Martinez, Hugo Martinez-McNaught, Olivia Reyes, Rick Martinez, Rick Bentley, Tom Brisson, Susan Towers and Californian North Kern correspondent Donald Goertzen.

This is one of the first images I made on the morning of Cesar Chavez's funeral in Delano.
This is one of the first images I made on the morning of Cesar Chavez’s funeral in Delano. The post-dawn light was gorgeous.

The early morning light was beautiful, warm and golden. Several hundred people milled about along Garces Highway in Delano, where the march would begin. Of course, in a few hours those hundreds would be thousands. But there were some nice pictures to be made. You don’t have to wait for an event to officially start to do good journalism. I noticed a Delano police officer holding a UFW flag, and the uniqueness immediately struck me. I don’t imagine too many Delano police officers held UFW flags in the 1960s as Chavez was organizing the farm workers. He was Sgt. Jose Roman, assigned to crowd control, and after I shot his picture, he gave me a great quote, just three words: “Everybody knew Cesar.” I struck up a conversation with a man working with a professional movie camera. He was Gregory Nava, the film director and screenwriter who had directed the critically-acclaimed film “El Norte” and would go on to direct “Selena” and “Mi Familia” and co-write “Frida.”

Then I spotted Dolores Huerta, walking with a few people. No media around. I had never met Huerta, and do not recall having photographed her. But I knew she was the co-founder, with Chavez, of the UFW. I moved toward her and knelt down as she reached over and removed a shoe, then replaced it with a tennis shoe. Holy crap! Dolores Huerta was putting on her tennis shoes for her final march with Cesar Chavez! And nobody was there except me. Could this be happening? She looked over and spotted me. She smiled and said “hello.” I said “hello.” And that was the first time I met Dolores Huerta. I was excited about the image I had just recorded, but couldn’t stay excited for long. The day was just getting started, there was much work to be done, who knows how many thousands of images were going to be made between the five of us?

Helen Chavez, Cesar's widow, her son, Paul, Ethel Kennedy and one of the Kennedy daughters (Rory, I think) march in the procession.
Helen Chavez, Cesar’s widow, her son, Paul, Ethel Kennedy and one of the Kennedy daughters (Rory, I think) march in the procession. Previously unpublished photo.

I walked the entire four miles of The Last March, along Garces Highway, through the fields where thousands upon thousands of workers Chavez became a hero to labored, to the Forty Acres compound. I’m sure I walked much more than four miles as I backtracked frequently to shoot pictures that I thought told the story of the day. Felix Adamo primarily remained at the front of the march, leaving me to work as sort of a rover, moving freely about the three-mile long stretch of marchers, estimated at 30,000.

Roman Catholic Cardinal Roger Mahoney of Los Angeles led the procession from Delano to the UFW's Forty Acres compound.
Roman Catholic Cardinal Roger Mahoney of Los Angeles led the procession from Delano to the UFW’s Forty Acres compound.
I liked this view of the marchers shot through the orchards along the route. Previously unpublished photo.
I liked this view of the marchers shot through the orchards along the route. Previously unpublished photo.
We were adamant that the focus of our photography be on the farm workers, people and Chavez's relatives, not on the celebrities in attendance. Previously unpublished photo.
We were adamant that the focus of our photography be on the farm workers, people and Chavez’s relatives, not on the celebrities in attendance. Previously unpublished photo.

It was that freedom to roam that led me to Rebecca Rivera. I almost missed her, but she caught my eye. She was sitting alone in the shade of an orchard tree, an infant in her arms. I took some shots and then went up to speak to her. I was curious as to why she was sitting in the orchid and not marching. She told me she was from Delano, spent 20 years working in the grape vineyards and was dying of intestinal cancer and didn’t have the strength to march, but had to attend somehow. So she sat and watched, clutching her 2-month-old grandson, Andres. I knew I had recorded something special. It was the moment that would stay with me for the rest of the day, even as I continued to shoot, probably hundreds of images.

The Californian’s coverage of The Last March and funeral of Cesar Chavez was something special. Twenty photos would accompany 11 stories, quite a display for the pre-Internet days. Today we would likely run three or four times as many photos online, but for 1993, it was quite a feat. No doubt, the biggest team coverage I was ever involved in. The editors who I delightfully skewer at the beginning of this post held true to their celebrities promise. Three tiny mug shots of Jesse Jackson, Jerry Brown and Edward James Olmos were the only pictures that made the paper. The coverage was about the people, the march, the funeral of Cesar Chavez. My reward for my coverage of the funeral of Cesar Chavez would come the next morning. Diana Ledbetter was a server at my neighborhood Marie Callender’s, where I went every morning for my coffee. I had just sat down when she came up and said, “Damn you, John Harte, you made me cry all morning. That picture of the lady in the field holding her grandson broke my heart.” That made my day. Here are The Bakersfield Californian pages, presented in high resolution so that you can read the stories and view the pictures.Chavez_paper_1 Chavez_paper_2 chavez_paper_3 chavez_paper_4 I would get to know Dolores Huerta over the years and photograph her frequently. She’s now 84 years old and lives in Bakersfield. She is, sadly,  somewhat of an enigma here, a giant in the world of civil and women’s rights, a woman who received the Presidential Medal of Freedom from President Obama and consistently tops lists of the most admired women among the nation’s young Latino women, yet her stature, fame and impact resides outside her conservative hometown that doesn’t much welcome or appreciate labor leaders, Democrats and activists. This is a town that prefers to measure its heroes by their ability to sing country songs, drive race cars and toss footballs. Dolores Huerta occupies a special “hero” place with the likes of former United States Supreme Court Chief Justice Earl Warren or the little known Gretchen Knief. Warren, a Republican appointee of President Dwight Eisenhower,  is still considered a traitor by some in these parts for his landmark Supreme Court civil rights rulings that changed the course and social landscape of American society in the second half of the past century. At least he has a school named after him. Knief, on the other hand, is almost completely unknown in Bakersfield. She’s the Kern County librarian who stood up to the Kern County Supervisors who banned John Steinbeck’s “Grapes of Wrath” in 1939. At the very least, she should have a library branch named after her. She doesn’t. I run into Dolores every once in a while, usually at community events, and most of the time I don’t take her picture, we just talk for a few minutes. I think she likes that.

I last photographed Dolores Huerta in April, 2014 with actress Rosario Dawson at the Bakersfield premier of the movie "Cesar Chavez."
I last photographed Dolores Huerta in April, 2014 with actress Rosario Dawson at the Bakersfield premier of the movie “Cesar Chavez.”
One of my students took a picture of me with Dolores Huerta in 2009.
One of my students took a picture of me with Dolores Huerta in 2009.

I learned a lesson that week of Cesar Chavez’s death and funeral, one that I would employ for the rest of my career. Trust your instincts as a journalist. Don’t involve editors until it’s too late for them to screw it up. Never again did I ask an editor if I should head out on a newsworthy story. I just did it, then when I got there, I’d call and let them know I was there. They would grumble a little, huff and puff, you know, “you should have told us first, but stay there and get the photos.” Bingo. And they don’t stay mad for too long. They probably forget all about it by the time they get to the next editors’ meeting.


Oh my God, you’re Pete Tittl!

Whenever a picture of Pete Tittl was needed, we shot him with a bag over his head. This one was shot by Liz Snyder in 1994.
Whenever a picture of Pete Tittl was needed, we shot him with a bag over his head. This one was shot by Liz Snyder in 1994.

Pete Tittl was the most feared journalist in Bakersfield. Just who is this Pete Tittl, those of you not from our town might ask? Was he a crack investigative reporter, a master at tracking how public monies are obtained, allocated, distributed and potentially abused? Nope. Was he a columnist keeping tabs on the city’s movers and shakers, ever on the lookout for the slightest hint of hypocrisy or impropriety? Nope. Pete Tittl was, and still is, The Bakersfield Californian’s restaurant reviewer. The mere thought of having Pete Tittl and his always unnamed “companion” visit a restaurant had owners quivering like a bowl of Jello and shaking like the earth under the San Andreas fault. And I had two encounters with restaurant owners regarding Pete Tittl that I have been delightfully sharing for three decades now.

First I should point out that Pete Tittl caused me many an aggravating photo shoot. You see, the restaurant owners never knew when Tittl was in their establishment, but every now and then, The Californian would want some pictures of the place, and the food, for the upcoming review. They would call the restaurant, tell the owner it was the subject of a review and arrange a photo shoot, and while Pete and his companion happily ate somewhere else, I would have to deal with the nervous restaurant owner, asking me, sometimes begging me, to tell him or her what was in the review. I never knew, and told them so, but that didn’t help matters any. So many times I would tell these owners that it really didn’t matter what the review said, it was going to be good for business. If Tittl gave a good review, people would flock to the restaurant to see if they agreed. If Tittl gave an unfavorable review, people would flock to the restaurant to see if they agreed. It did little to comfort the owners. I bring this up only because Pete Tittl reads this blog, just in case he wants to feel sorry for all the angst he has caused me over the years.

Now, back to my stories. In the early 1980s, just after I joined The Californian staff, we had a company-sponsored softball team. One day, after a game, we went to a popular local bar and grill for some food and drink. We were wearing uniforms with the company’s name on them, and I had my camera and was taking pictures, so it was no secret to the owner who we were. He came up and began talking about Pete Tittl and how he really wanted to know what he looked like in case he ever came to visit his restaurant, a place on California Avenue. Then he made me an offer: he would pay $300 for a photo of Pete Tittl. What the poor fool didn’t know was that Pete Tittl was on The Californian’s softball team and was sitting right there, right under his nose. At the time, I found nothing funny about the offer, and immediately reported it to the editors. I was young, right out of journalism school and full of that youthful journalistic righteousness and exuberance. I saw the offer as an attempt to subvert the journalistic process. I was a defender of truth, a believer of the importance of independent reporting and its role in keeping its citizenry informed. I was a regular freaking Jimmy Olsen, a guardian of blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. If I had it to do over again, I would have taken the guy’s $300 and given him a picture of my dad, then told my dad about this great restaurant he and my mom needed to go try.

In the fall of that year, or maybe the next, I would have an even more bizarre Pete Tittl experience. Californian sports writer Mike Griffith and I were sent to Tehachapi, a small mountain town east of Bakersfield, to cover a high school football game. We had heard about a pretty good steak house in the town, so we headed there early to try it out before the game. After placing our order and as we waited for our food, Mike pulled his notebook out of his pocket and began flipping through it. Mike was not a prep football reporter. His primary beats were auto racing and hunting and fishing, and his duties included producing the newspaper’s wildly popular weekly racing and outdoors pages. As he’s flipping through his notes, a woman shrieks, “Oh my God, you’re Pete Tittl!” I look up, stupidly expecting to see Pete standing inside the restaurant’s entrance. But she is staring right at Mike. Now she’s at the table, and she’s repeating herself. “Oh my God, you’re Pete Tittl. You’re here to review my restaurant.” No, we’re not, Mike explains. We’re here to cover the high school football game. I’m a sports reporter, he’s the photographer. We’re just having something to eat before the game. But she’s not buying it. She’s on to us. That’s obviously our cover story, in case we’re found out. Mike is Pete Tittl, and I’m his companion. And don’t you try to fool me. Again, we tell her we are in Tehachapi to cover a football game, and this time we show her our Bakersfield Californian IDs. But that too, she’s convinced, is part of the ruse, all an elaborate cover story to protect the mysterious Pete Tittl from discovery.

And then the food starts coming. And coming. And coming. Here, I want you to try this. OK, but we’re not Pete Tittl. Now I want you to try this. OK, but we’re not Pete Tittl. She’s at the table constantly, fussing, moving utensils as we eat. Try this steak. OK, but we’re not Pete Tittl. Try this chicken. OK, but we’re not Pete Tittl. Try these potatoes. OK, but we’re not Pete Tittl. Try this pork. OK, but we’re not Pete Tittl. More bread? OK, but we’re not Pete Tittl. And so it goes for the entire meal.

Now Mike and I have a little bit of a dilemma. The Californian, like all newspapers, has strict guidelines regarding the acceptance of gratuities, and we take our ethics policy seriously. Freebies are absolutely forbidden, a crucial component to responsible journalism. Your reporting cannot be trusted if you take anything from the people you are covering. Cash, food, alcohol, gifts. It’s all forbidden. So we had to figure out what to do about this very weird encounter. We were not in this woman’s restaurant to do a review. We were not in her restaurant in any capacity related to The Bakersfield Californian. We told her repeatedly that we were not Pete Tittl and offered her proof. Yet she unloaded on us a volume of food far beyond what our bill totaled. We decided we were not in violation of the newspaper’s ethics policy. We paid our bill, and just to be safe, we left a very sizable tip for our server. I did not have a particularly good shoot that night. I was lethargic and did not feel like moving around to get into position for my shots. I think I may have eaten a little too much.

Nowadays, more than 30 years later, people still ask me about Pete Tittl. Is he a real person? Yes. Is that his real name? Yes. Who is his “companion.” I really don’t know, but I assume it alternates between friends, coworkers, his wife and his now-grown children. What I  haven’t been asked again is if I would be willing to provide a picture of Pete Tittl for $300. If it happens, this time I’ll be ready. Hey, Dad, smile for the camera!